Browsing All posts tagged under »Michael Mann«

Heartland Institute billboard continues a long pattern of dishonesty

May 14, 2012

8

The Heartland Institute's recent Unabomber billboard and accompanying essay was filled with false allegations and errors, continuing Heartland's long history of dishonesty.

Serious errors and shortcomings void climate letter by 49 former NASA employees

April 25, 2012

26

Six errors plus two shortcomings equals 49 former NASA employees with no climate science credentials damaging their own reputations.

38 climate scientists respond to error-filled Wall Street Journal commentary

February 1, 2012

3

One of the many factual errors, misunderstandings, and misleading claims (I counted at least six) in a Wall Street Journal commentary denying human-caused climate disruption was that only four of the 16 co-signers had published on climate science, and only one has published anything significant on the topic recently. Many of the others were not […]

The 2011 Climate B.S.* of the Year Awards (corrected)

January 5, 2012

1

Peter H. Gleick collects the five most outrageous examples of climate BS (Bad Science) from 2011, with several runners-up. Number one? All the Republican presidential candidates.

How much context is in the Climategate emails? (updated)

November 23, 2011

111

The illegally hacked and published CRU emails do not contain enough context to draw any firm conclusions about much of anything - real investigations, where complete records are examined and the principles are interviewed about meetings, phone conversations, and white-board conversations are required. And all such investigations have found that the so-called Climategate emails show no evidence of misconduct or conspiracy.

Zombie climate emails rise again (updated)

November 22, 2011

1

After two years of fermenting in the back of the fridge, the Climategate hacker pulled out a rank and moldy pile of leftover emails out just in time for the second anniversary of the original illegal CRU email release.

Mann’s critics not appeased by NSF investigation, extend unfounded “whitewash” accusations to NSF itself

September 15, 2011

4

The OIG confirmed Penn State's result that Michael Mann was not guilty of research misconduct. So where are all Mann's critics admitting they were wrong about him?