Browsing All posts tagged under »climategate«

DC appeals court rejects attacks on EPA’s greenhouse gas Endangerment Finding

July 18, 2012

3

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that the greenhouse gas Endangerment Finding was exactly what the EPA said it was – based on sound scientific evidence and anchored firmly within the legal requirements of the Clean Air Act.

Heartland Institute billboard continues a long pattern of dishonesty

May 14, 2012

8

The Heartland Institute's recent Unabomber billboard and accompanying essay was filled with false allegations and errors, continuing Heartland's long history of dishonesty.

Heartland Institute billboard continues a long pattern of hypocrisy (updated)

May 10, 2012

5

The Unabomber billboard continues a long and dark history of institutional hypocrisy by The Heartland Institute.

The ethos of The Heartland Institute: brazen hypocrisy

February 27, 2012

5

The Heartland Institute continues its brazen calls for others to be ethical while refusing to behave ethically itself.

Climate scientist defense group and Peter Gleick illustrate Heartland’s irony and hypocrisy

February 21, 2012

5

The Heartland Institute's recent statements are filled with irony and hypocrisy, a point made abundantly clear by an official letter from the Climate Scientist Legal Defense Fund and by the admission of responsibility by Peter Gleick.

Climate science discussion between Burt Rutan and Brian Angliss

January 31, 2012

7

S&R's collection of a discussion on human-caused climate disruption between Brian Angliss, S&R climate/science writer and electrical engineer, and Burt Rutan, aerospace engineer and former CEO of Scaled Composites.

How much context is in the Climategate emails? (updated)

November 23, 2011

111

The illegally hacked and published CRU emails do not contain enough context to draw any firm conclusions about much of anything - real investigations, where complete records are examined and the principles are interviewed about meetings, phone conversations, and white-board conversations are required. And all such investigations have found that the so-called Climategate emails show no evidence of misconduct or conspiracy.