<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Daedalnexus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daedalnexus.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daedalnexus.net</link>
	<description>Surging through life&#039;s intricate core</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rep. Upton&#039;s business competition hypocrisy, exhibit A by Fraud Guy</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/10/uptons_hypocris-exhibit_a/#comment-3862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraud Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21536#comment-3862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, they&#039;ve come up with a solution, all right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they&#8217;ve come up with a solution, all right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rep. Upton&#039;s business competition hypocrisy, exhibit A by Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/10/uptons_hypocris-exhibit_a/#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Angliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21536#comment-3861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EnergySolutions Inc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EnergySolutions Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rep. Upton&#039;s business competition hypocrisy, exhibit A by Samuel Smith</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/10/uptons_hypocris-exhibit_a/#comment-3860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21536#comment-3860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which one? We should be as specific as possible in these cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which one? We should be as specific as possible in these cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rep. Upton&#039;s business competition hypocrisy, exhibit A by Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/10/uptons_hypocris-exhibit_a/#comment-3859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Angliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21536#comment-3859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing to see, actually - According to OpenSecrets.org, Upton went from having a small fraction of his political donations being energy and natural resources in 2006 to having those donations take the top spot in 2008 and 2010.  At the same time, out-of-state donations went up from 16% in 2004 to 25% in 2006, 31% in 2008, and 33% in 2010.  The single largest donor to Upton&#039;s campaign in 2010 was an energy company out of Salt Lake City.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing to see, actually &#8211; According to OpenSecrets.org, Upton went from having a small fraction of his political donations being energy and natural resources in 2006 to having those donations take the top spot in 2008 and 2010.  At the same time, out-of-state donations went up from 16% in 2004 to 25% in 2006, 31% in 2008, and 33% in 2010.  The single largest donor to Upton&#8217;s campaign in 2010 was an energy company out of Salt Lake City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rep. Upton&#039;s business competition hypocrisy, exhibit A by Samuel Smith</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/10/uptons_hypocris-exhibit_a/#comment-3858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21536#comment-3858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money can&#039;t buy happiness, but it can buy a politician.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money can&#8217;t buy happiness, but it can buy a politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton by Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/01/the-perpetual-debunking-of-christopher-monckton/#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Angliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21405#comment-3857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarkably, if you replaced &quot;Mr. Cook&quot; with &quot;Mr. Monckton,&quot; your comment would be correct.

The debate thing is a red herring, since to the best of my knowledge, neither Monckton nor Cook have ever challenged the other to a debate.  If you&#039;ve ever listened to one of Monckton&#039;s presentations, however, you&#039;ll notice that he rattles off dozens if not hundreds of &quot;facts,&quot; sprinkles in Latin phrases that nearly no-one knows, and does an excellent job of &lt;em&gt;sounding&lt;/em&gt; authoritative.  It&#039;s unfortunate for Monckton that his claims are nearly all false and the quotes he attributes to papers and scientists are nearly all misintepreted and/or taken out of context.

The Latin serves its purpose, however - people in the audience are left struggling to guess what Monckton said so long that they miss the fact that he&#039;s moved on to some new false claim that often is completely contradictory to the false claims he was making earlier in his presentation.

Monckton is an excellent salesman.  I&#039;m certain he would have been fantastically successful selling snake oil tonics to the ignorant, scared, and naive in a bygone era.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkably, if you replaced &#8220;Mr. Cook&#8221; with &#8220;Mr. Monckton,&#8221; your comment would be correct.</p>
<p>The debate thing is a red herring, since to the best of my knowledge, neither Monckton nor Cook have ever challenged the other to a debate.  If you&#8217;ve ever listened to one of Monckton&#8217;s presentations, however, you&#8217;ll notice that he rattles off dozens if not hundreds of &#8220;facts,&#8221; sprinkles in Latin phrases that nearly no-one knows, and does an excellent job of <em>sounding</em> authoritative.  It&#8217;s unfortunate for Monckton that his claims are nearly all false and the quotes he attributes to papers and scientists are nearly all misintepreted and/or taken out of context.</p>
<p>The Latin serves its purpose, however &#8211; people in the audience are left struggling to guess what Monckton said so long that they miss the fact that he&#8217;s moved on to some new false claim that often is completely contradictory to the false claims he was making earlier in his presentation.</p>
<p>Monckton is an excellent salesman.  I&#8217;m certain he would have been fantastically successful selling snake oil tonics to the ignorant, scared, and naive in a bygone era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton by mepluribusunum</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/01/the-perpetual-debunking-of-christopher-monckton/#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mepluribusunum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21405#comment-3856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a crock! &quot;No one can possibly counter any of Monckton&#039;s facts and figures in any debate&quot;? Is it because Mr. Cook is so uninformed that he wouldn&#039;t know where to begin to have a one-on-one debate? I say, it must be difficult for Cook to follow someone of Monckton&#039;s stature. Afterall, it&#039;s quite easy to take what scientist has taken out of context and to arrange the argument in Cook&#039;s favor after the fact. Ah, this is what is so dangerous about the Internet...posting whatever you like, making up your own climate science, and hoping some of it sticks. No, thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a crock! &#8220;No one can possibly counter any of Monckton&#8217;s facts and figures in any debate&#8221;? Is it because Mr. Cook is so uninformed that he wouldn&#8217;t know where to begin to have a one-on-one debate? I say, it must be difficult for Cook to follow someone of Monckton&#8217;s stature. Afterall, it&#8217;s quite easy to take what scientist has taken out of context and to arrange the argument in Cook&#8217;s favor after the fact. Ah, this is what is so dangerous about the Internet&#8230;posting whatever you like, making up your own climate science, and hoping some of it sticks. No, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate disruption denier Monckton responds to detailed scientific rebuttal with attempted intimidation (updated) by Meet the skeptics</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2010/07/15/monckton-attempts-intimidation/#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meet the skeptics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=17380#comment-3711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton by Tweets that mention The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2011/02/01/the-perpetual-debunking-of-christopher-monckton/#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=21405#comment-3855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet3.0, Chael Montgomery. Chael Montgomery said: Scholars&amp;Rogues: The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton http://bit.ly/gPu5w2 #TAF #TFB [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet3.0, Chael Montgomery. Chael Montgomery said: Scholars&amp;Rogues: The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton <a href="http://bit.ly/gPu5w2" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/gPu5w2</a> #TAF #TFB [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21 expert climate scientists refute Monckton’s House testimony by The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton</title>
		<link>http://daedalnexus.net/2010/09/24/21-experts-refute-monckton/#comment-3761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The perpetual debunking of Christopher Monckton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=18921#comment-3761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to testify. 21 scientists felt so strongly about Monckton&#8217;s error-packed testimony that they wrote a detailed refutation of his testimony and submitted it back before the 2010 election. At least now if Congressman Fred Upton or Darrell Issa call Monckton to testify again in the US [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to testify. 21 scientists felt so strongly about Monckton&#8217;s error-packed testimony that they wrote a detailed refutation of his testimony and submitted it back before the 2010 election. At least now if Congressman Fred Upton or Darrell Issa call Monckton to testify again in the US [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

